Friday, September 10, 2010

"They Shall Not Be Moved Out of Their Place"

When I was reflecting the other day on the early days of the Welfare Program, and Harold B. Lee's role in it, I was reminded again how imperative it was then to encourage the members of the Church to follow the Brethren the Lord had raised up in these last days.  If there is a recurring theme in the sermons of Harold B. Lee, it would have to be the counsel to "follow the Brethren."

He was fond of quoting this scripture: 

Wherefore, meaning the church, thou shalt give heed unto all his [Joseph Smith's] words and commandments which he shall give unto you as he receiveth them, walking in all holiness before me;
For his word ye shall receive, as if from mine own mouth, in all patience and faith.
For by doing these things the gates of hell shall not prevail against you; yea, and the Lord God will disperse the powers of darkness from before you, and cause the heavens to shake for your good, and his name's glory.
For thus saith the Lord God: Him have I inspired to move the cause of Zion in mighty power for good, and his diligence I know, and his prayers I have heard.
Yea, his weeping for Zion I have seen, and I will cause that he shall mourn for her no longer; for his days of rejoicing are come unto the remission of his sins, and the manifestations of my blessings upon his works.
For, behold, I will bless all those who labor in my vineyard with a mighty blessing, and they shall believe on his words, which are given him through me by the Comforter, which manifesteth that Jesus was crucified by sinful men for the sins of the world, yea, for the remission of sins unto the contrite heart.  (D&C 21:4-9).

That revelation was given on the day the Church was organized, April 6, 1830.  It always struck me as significant that even before the Church was organized, apparently Joseph Smith had "wept" for Zion.  In those formative years as revelation upon revelation burst upon him, it is striking to think what the enormity of the task that lay ahead of him must have been.  From the moment the Church was organized until this very writing, the cause of Zion has grown throughout the world.  We are witnessing its steady progress across the earth today.

Did anyone foresee the day when there would be temples in Russia?  On August 29, 2010, the temple in Kyiv Ukraine was dedicated by President Thomas S. Monson, making it the 134th operating temple worldwide.  We are living in the day foretold in that first formative revelation on April 6, 1830, when the cause of Zion is literally being fulfilled before our eyes.

There was a difficult time in Church history, when the Lord gave perhaps the sternest warning appearing anywhere in scripture.  It was when the first Nauvoo Temple was being built.  We still encounter opposition whenever a new temple is announced, that is true, but it was nothing like what it was in those days.  For that reason, it seems, the Saints delayed in commencing the work to build the Nauvoo Temple, knowing that the minute they set about the task persecution would surely come. 

In His patience, the Lord extended the time, but the extension also brought about the stern warning:  "If you do not these things at the end of the appointment ye shall be rejected as a church, with your dead, saith the Lord your God."  (D&C 124:32). 

But as is so often with the Lord, there are marvelous blessings coupled with the warnings.  This time was proof of that:  "If my people will hearken unto my voice, and unto the voice of my servants whom I have appointed to lead my people, behold, verily I say unto you, they shall not be moved out of their place." (D&C 124:45). 

There are many people struggling in this worldwide economy and society to hold on to their families in the midst of the gathering storms ahead.  This promise should give great comfort.  Who doesn't want to hold on to the hope that if faithful they will have a place of inheritance?

We live now in an openly hostile and wicked world seeking to not only undermine traditional family values, but to topple the very pillars by which they are upheld.  I never would have believed that by statute and by constitutional amendment state by state, we would see a day when marriage would of necessity have to be defined legally as between a man and a woman.  Living prophets have declared: 

We, the First Presidency and the Council of the Twelve Apostles of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, solemnly proclaim that marriage between a man and a woman is ordained of God and that the family is central to the Creator's plan for the eternal destiny of His children.
All human beings — male and female — are created in the image of God. Each is a beloved spirit son or daughter of heavenly parents, and, as such, each has a divine nature and destiny. Gender is an essential characteristic of individual premortal, mortal, and eternal identity and purpose.  ("The Family:  A Proclamation to the World," read by President Gordon B. Hinckley as part of his message at the General Relief Society Meeting held September 23, 1995, in Salt Lake City, Utah).

The promise we shall not be moved out of our place is a restatement of what the Lord told the multitude: "Blessed are ye if ye shall give heed unto the words of these twelve whom I have chosen from among you to minister unto you, and to be your servants." (3 Nephi 12:1). 

I repeat the promise that those who hearken to the voice of these men whom the Lord has raised up "shall not be moved out of their place."' (D&C 124:45). 

But the promise was followed with this caution: "But if they will not hearken to my voice, nor unto the voice of these men whom I have appointed, they shall not be blest." (D&C 124:46).

There are among us today some very erudite and persuasive voices who would have us believe that changing the views of the leaders of the Church on the bedrock eternal principles they have published in the Proclamation is akin to "waiting them out" until their views soften and they finally cave under pressure from the world as they did on plural marriage and the blacks and the priesthood.  These voices are not in harmony with the living prophets, and gay and lesbian marriage stands in stark opposition to the revealed will of God through His servants. 

We can and should reach out in love to all, but to believe for one instant this fundamental truth can be altered somehow is folly and will end in misery if pursued to its logical conclusion.

I say that because the definition of marriage is in a separate category.  The leaders of the Church are either inspired or they are mere mortals free to alter doctrine as they might policies and procedures at their whim and fancy.

In order to have the promise not to be moved out of our place, we must stand with the living prophets and smite the threatening waves before us, even though our stance will be increasingly unpopular.

In the October 1970 General Conference, President Harold B. Lee made some prophetic remarks as he introduced President Joseph Fielding Smith.  This is what he said:

We have some tight places to go before the Lord is through with this church and the world in this dispensation, which is the last dispensation, which shall usher in the coming of the Lord. The gospel was restored to prepare a people ready to receive him. The power of Satan will increase; we see it in evidence on every hand. There will be inroads within the Church. There will be, as President Tanner has said, "Hypocrites, those professing, but secretly are full of dead men's bones." We will see those who profess membership but secretly are plotting and trying to lead people not to follow the leadership that the Lord has set up to preside in this church.

Now the only safety we have as members of this church is to do exactly what the Lord said to the Church in that day when the Church was organized. We must learn to give heed to the words and commandments that the Lord shall give through his prophet, "as he receiveth them, walking in all holiness before me. . . as if from mine own mouth, in all patience and faith." (D&C 21:4-5). There will be some things that take patience and faith. You may not like what comes from the authority of the Church. It may contradict your political views. It may contradict your social views. It may interfere with some of your social life. But if you listen to these things, as if from the mouth of the Lord himself, with patience and faith, the promise is that "the gates of hell shall not prevail against you; yea, and the Lord God will disperse the powers of darkness from before you, and cause the heavens to shake for your good, and his name's glory." (D&C 21:6).  (CR, October 1970, 152-3).

In three short weeks we will have the privilege once again of sitting at the feet of the living prophets among us and taking counsel from them.  As we sustain them and uphold them with our faith and prayers, the promise that the gates of hell will not prevail against us and that we will not be moved out of our place will come to pass. 

Ignore them, and we will not be blessed.

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Internet Anonymity

This letter to the editor of the Deseret News attracted my attention this evening:

Please turn off the ability to "comment" on stories published in the Deseret News. I hate reading articles on immigration, gay marriage, religion or even the recent NCAA conference realignments because of the comments people post on these stories. User names and pseudonyms allow people to hide behind "masks" and post the most insensitive, crass, horrible comments.

If you believe in something or have an opinion, sign your name; sign your real name to your comments and beliefs. Allow your children, your employer, your neighbors and your friends to really know what you believe. If you don't feel as though you can sign your real name to your comments, then I encourage you to keep your opinions and thoughts to yourself.

Jessica Alba
West Jordan

* * *

If I were the Deseret News, I would never consider "turning off" the right to offer your opinion, even if you choose to offer it anonymously.

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

There is a long legal history associated with freedom of speech in this country.  While I have seen a lot of "stuff" that qualifies under some pretty expansive judicial interpretations of freedom of speech in my lifetime (pornography comes instantly to mind), one thing I have strong feelings about is "hiding" behind your speech as though no one knows or is taking note.

When I first contemplated the idea of writing a blog, I was confronted with this question.  Some cautioned that my identity could be compromised, and argued for anonymity as a blogger.  I wondered to myself, "If my identity could be 'compromised' or I could be 'misrepresented' in my anonymous views, or my true identity could potentially be revealed to the world against my will, then why wouldn't I want the world to know my true identity voluntarily right out the gate?"  Isn't the best defense a good offense?

First, I want my children and grandchildren to know what I think.  My only goal here is not to embarrass them too much.  I'm ultimately accountable to God, but also to my family.  It keeps me grounded somewhat, though I've never been too shy about sharing my true beliefs.  I'm doing much of what I do here for that precise reason.  I don't much care if anyone else gets any value from my views, but I'm particularly interested in having my children know where I stand on what I perceive to be the critical issues of our day in two areas always deemed to be "taboo" in polite conversation:  Politics and Religion.  I, for one, am grateful for a cyberspace forum that makes it possible to make one's views known, and let the chips fall where they may. 

I offer no apology for what I think or believe, and I'm leaving my signature affixed.  I don't pretend to represent anyone but myself here, and I welcome the accountability that attaches.  You don't have to agree with me.  I just want to say it as well as I can.

Someone suggested I should do a Google search on myself before I started this blog.  So I did.  There wasn't much there.  I decided I would go "out there" with exactly what I think and feel without the shield of anonymity, and thus The Goates Notes was born with full disclosure about its author. 

I remember Harold B. Lee offering some sound advice about anonymous letters.  He received perhaps thousands of them during his lifetime as a General Authority.  He would always say, even when they were hurtful personally, "I just consider the source (Anonymous), then conclude they must not really have the power of their convictions if they don't sign their name."

I know many find "comfort" in hiding behind their true identity on the Internet.  These folks must still be delusional, thinking perhaps no one really knows who they are.  However, that is completely simplistic.  When you comment on the Deseret News forums, for example, your true identity may hide behind a public pseudonym for a username, but the forum monitors at the website have your real e-mail address, and it's easily traced.  Further, every computer has a distinct IP address easily traced to its true owner.  How many times have we been told from how many knowledgeable sources that we must never assume we are completely "safe" or "protected" on the Internet? 

Anonymity on the Internet is like being a "little bit pregnant," it seems to me.

Many are fearful what they might say as an anonymous source might come back later to haunt them.  My thought is that if you are hiding behind an anonymous comment for fear of retribution, then why put those potentially harmful thoughts in writing in the first place?  If you feel it, if you believe it, if you want to persuade others to your point of view, if you want to promote your ideas in marketing or sales, then what's the point in hiding behind your shrouded identity?

I used to comment about one particularly opinionated person I know.  I would say, "He may not always be right, but he's never unsure."  And I always knew where he stood on an issue.

I believe in the protected individual right to free speech, and I encourage its free expression, even if that right is exercised by idiots like the guy who wants to burn the Quran on Saturday.  Despite almost universal condemnation of his stated plans, he has the right under the Constitution to be stupid.  And he's not doing it anonymously. 

He may be wrong, but at this writing, he is showing no signs of being unsure. 

In a strange sort of way, the fact that he is who he says he is -- a bigoted idiot posing as a Christian minister -- that's better in my mind than someone who hides in the bushes and throws stink bombs at glass houses, thinking he can remain undetected.

If you believe it, then say it, write it, sing it, publish it or burn it -- but attach your name to it. 

Just remember, hiding from an omnipotent, omniscent, omnipresent God of heaven and earth is as futile as putting on some fig leaves supposing to cover your nakedness.

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Political Quote of the Day

President Obama's former director of the White House Office of Management and Budget from 2009 to 2010, Peter Orszag, offered an op-ed piece that caught my eye today in the New York Times.  Presumably free to speak his mind now, this is what he said:

"The nation faces a nasty dual deficit problem: a painful jobs deficit in the near term and an unsustainable budget deficit over the medium and long term. This month, the Senate will be debating an issue with significant implications for both — what to do about the Bush-era tax cuts scheduled to expire at the end of the year.

"In the face of the dueling deficits, the best approach is a compromise: extend the tax cuts for two years and then end them altogether. Ideally only the middle-class tax cuts would be continued for now. Getting a deal in Congress, though, may require keeping the high-income tax cuts, too. And that would still be worth it.

"Why does this combination make sense? The answer is that over the medium term, the tax cuts are simply not affordable. Yet no one wants to make an already stagnating jobs market worse over the next year or two, which is exactly what would happen if the cuts expire as planned."

 Cutting taxes right now on people who create jobs?  Gee, now there's a thought. 

After throwing a TRILLION DOLLARS at the economy in "stimulus spending" that hasn't stimulated much yet, with another $50 Billion announced today, and watching unemployment rise to 9.6 percent in August. . .

. . . cutting taxes sounds like something right out of the Ronald Reagan playbook.

But we didn't have to wait long for Obama's response.  We won't adopt, he adamantly proclaims, "the same philosophy that led to this mess in the first place."

Monday, September 6, 2010

Dinner with Dad

Patsy was in Chicago last week tending three grandchildren to give a brief respite to Steve and Tina so they could sneak away together with the baby.  When she left, she gave explicit instructions that I should take my father to dinner sometime during her absence.  I called him on Wednesday night to arrange our dinner date.

In various post-surgery periods in recent years, Dad and I have had a lot of dinner dates.  To bolster his heart condition, one of his prescribed remedies was a weekly steak dinner.  We both took full advantage of that "treatment," and shared many samplings of various cuts from many purveyors.

The other night we renewed our dinner date tradition.  When I called him and asked which he would prefer, going out somewhere or having me pick something up and bring it to the house, he thought for a moment and said, "Something with cheese on it," then quickly added, "It's been about four and a half years since I've had a Crown Burger, why don't you pick one up and bring it here?"

For the uninitiated, a Crown Burger is a delectable and inspired combination of pastrami and a quarter pound hamburger patty with sauce, lettuce and cheese.  I'm good for about one a year.  Any more than that and I'd be aggravating and encouraging a gout attack.

So I did as instructed and picked up the Crown Burgers with fries and chocolate shakes, and brought them to his home.  The back door was wide open when I arrived on a warm summer evening and I could hear a baseball broadcast blaring throughout the house.  When I went into the family room, I discovered the obvious reason for his choice of the dinner venue.  The Yankees were playing the A's in Yankee Stadium.  Between innings when the commercials came on he did what he always does, what all men do -- he flipped the channel to the U.S. Open Tennis Tournament.  Dad subscribes to the Yankee channel on cable these days.  He doesn't miss many games either.  I know the Yankees are doing well this year, but he knows a lot more details than I do. 

John Isner was playing his match in the Open.  At Wimbledon in June, he won a 70-68 fifth set over Nicolas Mahut in a match that went a total of 183 games and 11 hours, 5 minutes spread over three days. It was the longest match in professional tennis history.  To put that feat it into perspective, in three full matches in New York at the U.S. Open — two victories and a loss — Isner played a total of 116 games, and a combined 8 hours, 12 minutes.  Isner lost that night, but boy is he fun to watch.  He's 6'8" with a booming service game.

So it was obvious to me that Dad was in his sports zone that night.  No wonder we were eating at home!

You have to know something about Dad and me.  Dad taught me how to play baseball and tennis.  He came to every Little League game I ever played and kept all the stats for all the teams in our league in his scorebook.  Sports was our life in those days, coming by it naturally, imbued and imbedded in our souls as a gift from Les Goates, the legendary sports columnist for the Deseret News, who was my Dad's father and my grandfather.  It was back in the day when Utah State and Utah played a football game on Thanksgiving Day!!  I don't remember ever missing one when we were growing up.  Thanksgiving Day dinner always happened after the big game.  It was back in the day when you could by stock in the Salt Lake Bees, and we all owned a small share of the team.  It was the golden era of Billy "the Hill" McGill at the Einar Nielsen Fieldhouse at the UofU.  At 6'9", he was the tallest man I had ever met until I shook hands with Mark Eaton years later.  

But I digress.  Don Larsen was a journeyman pitcher, whose career was at best pedestrian until that unforgettable day, October 8, 1956.  It was game five of the World Series.  I went home for lunch, running most of the way from Wasatch Elementary School a few blocks from our home, to take full advantage of the hour I could watch the game.  When I arrived, I was surprised to find Dad there for his lunch too.  Together we sat glued to the black and white screen emitting the sights and sounds over our DuMont television set.

That day, Don Larsen was doing something extraordinary that had never been done before.  He was working on a perfect game.  We sat together and watched in an awed trance.  All thoughts of returning to school and work were banished.  It wasn't even a close call, despite a mild protest from Mom.  No one in Yankee Stadium or in our family room dared to speak of what was happening for fear of jinxing it, but the scoreboard told the story, inning after inning -- no runs, no walks, no hits, no runners ever reached first base.  In the end, 27 Dodger batters had come to the plate, and 27 had been retired in perfect order. 

It was the only "perfect game" ever pitched in the long and storied history of the World Series.  And he did it against the Brooklyn Dodgers.  His perfect game remains the only no-hitter of any type ever pitched in postseason play. 

Together, my Dad and I had witnessed baseball perfection.  That moment in time will always be ours to claim and to share forever.  Perfection.  We all strive for it, but few attain it in this life.

I'm not certain exactly when it happened, but I was always a Yankee fan.  My boyhood idol was Mickey Mantle.  I learned to switch hit because of Mick.  The way I knelt in the on deck circle was a total homage to the Mick.  My goal was to hit as many homers as he did someday.  Well, why not?  Shoot high. 

When I played Little League ball, I rode my bike through the Salt Lake City Cemetery either alone or with my brother Hal night after night to practice and games.  We had no headlights, but we knew the path well.  There was never any fear -- either that we would fall into an open grave or that the boogey man would grab us.  When it's about baseball, there is no fear of anything.  We were invincible, kings of our domain.

Each day when we weren't playing organized baseball or tennis, we were at Reservoir Park, two blocks south of our home on "U" Street.  Mom finally hit upon the idea of an obnoxious cow bell to call her boys home for dinner.  It could be heard two blocks away when we were playing, and it always signalled the end, or at least the temporary interruption, of our games.

There were seldom enough neighborhood players to make up nine-on-nine games, but that was never a problem -- we loved playing "over the line," and we played it for years as though we owned that park.  We invented scoring systems and argued over whether or not the ball was hit hard enough to get over the basepaths on the fly.  It was great fun, days we relished.  When summer came, there was never a thought about doing anything else, except maybe playing tennis on the Reservoir courts.  Those were the golden days of childhood. 

The only time we slowed down was for the Mother-mandated "quiet time" in the heat of the day (to prevent the dreaded disease polio, we were told) when we could read whatever books we chose.  I remember one summer being enthralled with Lloyd C. Douglas and The Magnificient Obsession and The Robe.  When I finished those, I found The Big Fisherman.

Apart from that, we were completely unfettered and free.  There was never a concern about being molested, abused or kidnapped.  Such concerns were never factored into the equation.  The worst we may have ever witnessed was a drunk man passed out under the shade of a tree.  It was a simpler time.  And the best part for me was being a Yankee fan.

When I turned fifty, on the very day, I happened to be at a convention in Boston with Patsy at my side.  Someone handed me two tickets to the ballpark that night.  Not just any ballpark.  THE Fenway Park.  The Green Monster.  Ted Williams.  Carl Yastremski.  The Yankees were in town.  My first and only encounter with Ted Williams happened on that trip.  He was staying at the same hotel we were.  He was in a wheelchair by then, and I got to see him on the mezzanine level, the legendary slugger who finished one season with a .402 batting average.  That feat had never been done before or repeated ever since. 

Hitting a round ball with a round piece of wood one out of three times on average is enough to land professional baseball player in the Hall of Fame.  There's a lesson in persistence and picking yourself up off the ground when you fail in that statistic.  "I am not judged for the number of times I fail, but for the number of times I fail and keep trying."  Tom Hopkins said it first, but it could be the mantra for everyone who's ever played baseball.

I was determined to take full advantage of those tickets on my birthday in Boston.  We left early on the train for the ballpark to watch batting practice.  I found a brave vendor offering Yankee "on field" caps for sale.  That's the genuine version, the one the players wear "on field."  It was more than I could stand.  I bought one that night (which I still own and wear), and we sat along the first base side under the covered pavilion of the upper deck, our view partially blocked by the iron pillars.  But I was in heaven.  For a little boy from Utah, it was almost a religious experience.  We sat among the Yankee faithful.  "Let's go Yankees," rang out again and again.  "Let's go Red Sox," was returned with even more vigor in response.  We went back to the hotel happy that night.  I had my new cap and the Bronx Bombers had won.

The other night with Dad, I was a boy all over again.  All the memories came flooding back.  I've been savoring them all week.  Dad's 88 years old now, still diligently working on his longevity "consecutive games played" streak with all the daily courage required.  I put enough protein into him that night to carry him a few more days, and he even saved half of it to be reheated and enjoyed a second time. 

I'm not certain how many more dinners like that we'll have, but I do know this -- we'll always have that cherished memory together of witnessing perfection once in our lives when the Yankees beat the Dodgers in the 1956 World Series because of Don Larsen's perfect game.

And for a little boy, it just doesn't get any better than that.

Sunday, September 5, 2010

Four Simple Ideas for the Unemployed

It seems a worthy topic for a Labor Day weekend, when the national unemployment numbers took another upward tick last week. 

In our voluntary assignment at the Employment Resource Center, we see again and again the principles of pure religion playing out in welfare service in 2010. 

The earliest foundations of the Welfare Plan of the Church were laid in 1935 in the midst of the Great Depression.  Harold B. Lee, a young stake president (age 32 when he was called) in the Pioneer Stake, is often credited with the earliest experiments to help his unemployed adult male population.  But there was never any doubt in his mind where the inspiration came from to create the Welfare Plan.

In his journal, under date of April 20, 1935, Harold B. Lee records: 

"I was called into the office of the First Presidency, where with President Heber J. Grant and President David O. McKay (President Clark then being in the East, but they had had some communications with him so that all members of the Presidency were in agreement) I discussed the relief situation in the Church and various methods of handling the same. President Grant said he wanted to take a 'leaf out of Pioneer Stake's book' in caring for the people of the Church. He expressed dissatisfaction with the then existent program of social service investigations. He said that there was nothing more important for the Church to do than to take care of its needy people and that so far as he was concerned, every thing else must be sacrificed [so that] proper relief [could be] extended to our people. I was astounded to learn that for years there had been before them, as a result of their thinking and planning and as a result of the inspiration of Almighty God, the genius of the very plan that was waiting and in preparation for a time when, in their judgment, the faith of the Latter-day Saints was such that they were willing to follow the counsel of the men who lead and preside in this Church. My humble place in this program at that time was described."

Many years later, when he himself was President of the Church in 1972, Harold B. Lee described what happened to him after that meeting by quoting further from his journal to the assembled General Priesthood meeting:

"I left the First Presidency's Office about noontime with an assignment to work out a program of relief for the entire Church based upon my experience with the relief problem in the Pioneer Stake, where perhaps the greatest problem of unemployment in the entire Church was to be found.
"Almost in a daze with the magnitude of this assignment over powering me, I drove my car up to the head of City Creek Canyon into what was then called Rotary Park, where I could meditate and determine upon a course that would realize the objective that had been set for me by the Presidency. After I had driven my car as far as I could, I got out and walked up through the trees. seeking a secluded spot, where I knelt in prayer and sought the guidance of an all-wise God in this mighty undertaking. I told the Lord to guide me to conclusions dictated by his will, and that, for the safety and blessing of his people, I must have his direction. "As I kneeled down, my petition was: 'What kind of an organization should be set up in order to accomplish what the Presidency has assigned?'
"Having sought my Heavenly Father, I sat down to pore over this matter, wondering about an organization to be perfected to carry on this work. There came to me on that glorious spring afternoon one of the most heavenly realizations of the power of the priesthood of God, that God had already revealed the greatest organization that could ever be given to mankind and that all that was needed now was that that organization be set to work. It was as though some thing were saying to me: 'There is no new organization necessary to take care of the needs of this people. All that is necessary is to put the priesthood of God to work. There is nothing else that you need as a substitute, and if you use it the temporal welfare of the Latter-day Saints will be safeguarded.'"

 If you are not reminded of those simple beginnings, you may be oblivious to the fulfillment going on around you today.  The priesthood of God is fully engaged.  The leadership of the Church has given the direction in our day about what we should be doing.  As never before, we are living in a volunteer Church.  We are serving one another, loving one another as we never have to answer the extremities in which we find ourselves financially and economically.  There are no government programs needed today, just as there were none needed in the 1930s when the Welfare Plan was launched.

Some of the "founding fathers" who were on the scene attest to its divine origins through the First Presidency of the Church at the time, Heber J. Grant, J. Reuben Clark and David O. McKay:

"With the inspiration of this movement attested to by such witnesses as coming from divine sources, any Latter-day Saint who believes in the principle of continuous revelation cannot fail to heed the call of the prophets 'to set up a system where the evils of the dole will be abolished and where independence, thrift, industry, and self-respect can again be established among our people.'" (Heber J. Grant, October, 1936; "Church Security" by Harold B. Lee, as quoted in The Church Welfare Plan, by Henry D. Taylor, 37).

"I never heard President Grant say that he had seen the Master, that he had seen the Father, or that he had heard a voice about the welfare plan. But that does not mean that he did not have a revelation. . .
"But there is still another way in which revelation comes, and that way is through the ministrations of the Holy Ghost. . . Now I say unto you, that that kind of revelation, revelation of the Holy Ghost, did come to President Grant. Not only in this case, but in others. And through that revelation, inspiration if you wish to call it, from the Holy Ghost, President Grant launched this great welfare plan."  (J. Reuben Clark, Jr., in an address to the Central Utah Welfare Regional Meeting at Brigham Young University, August 3, 1951).

"That Church Security Plan has not come up as a mushroom over night. It is the result of inspiration, and that inspiration has come from the Lord. . . Those who have selfishness in their hearts would like to see it fail, but it is not going to fail."  (David O. McKay at a meeting of the Salt Lake Region, February, 1937).

"I believe I have heard almost all the objections which have been raised against it, and also the labored arguments in justification for not living it. As I have listened to these objections and arguments, I have been painfully aware of the dull spirit in which they have been urged. . .  I believe I have made a rather complete study and I now testify to you that I do know beyond any doubt, by the same power that Peter knew that Jesus is the Christ, that the Church Welfare Plan in its inception was and now is inspired of the Lord; and that the great principles implemented by it are eternal truths, which the saints of God must abide if they are to purify and perfect themselves as the Lord has commanded." (Marion G. Romney, Conference Report, October 1945, 156).

The Lord's will had been made known and he had raised up the man to help solve the oppressive problems of the Saints. That Harold B. Lee was a magnificent innovator and a spiritually directed master organizer is abundantly attested by Church history, and those gifts were especially well-illustrated by his part in the development of the Church Welfare Plan.  But it was the leadership of the First Presidency, and their unflagging support that was key to its ultimate launch and subsequent development. 

Today, we are eyewitnesses of the law of consecration in action, as originally envisioned.

In 2010, there are still some misguided ideas about how things work in the Church's Welfare Plan.  Whether you are unemployed yourself or you know someone who is, here are four simple ideas to assist you:

1.  The Employment Resource Center teaches self-reliance in the job search. 

I am still surprised when people call me or e-mail me because they've heard I'm the guy with jobs at the Church.  They want me to hook them up with a job, tell them where to go to find it, and introduce them to all the people I know who are hiring.  I wish it were that easy and sometimes I wish it were true that I know all those people, but it isn't quite that simple.  Instead, the Church has prepared a marvelous resource called the Profession Career Workshop, a two-day revelatory experience designed to reveal the job seeker's skills and strengths to themselves.  Introspection, self-examination, and personal revelation are the key elements of the workshop.  Remember, no law the Lord has given is temporal, not even the job search:  "Wherefore, verily I say unto you that all things unto me are spiritual, and not at any time have I given unto you a law which was temporal; neither any man, nor the children of men; neither Adam, your father, whom I created. Behold, I gave unto him that he should be an agent unto himself; and I gave unto him commandment, but no temporal commandment gave I unto him, for my commandments are spiritual; they are not natural nor temporal, neither carnal nor sensual."  (D&C 29:34-35).  For non-professionals without college degrees, the Career Workshop is likewise outlined in the same way with similar principles but different applications.  The job seeker is shown tools to develop power statements, resumes, and cutting-edge suggestions about how to find a job in today's unadvertised job market.  It is powerful and it works, but it is powerful because it reignites the job seeker in his own individual search, not because it hands them a job without effort on their part.

2.  Network or don't work. 

The Church provides the forum for a weekly association with other job seekers.  When I first attended, it resembled what seemed to me to be an AA meeting, everyone standing momentarily and giving something called "Me in 30 Seconds," and I was first amused, then engaged by it, then fully immersed in helping others around me connect with resources I knew with whom I was connecting them.  There is something very counter-intuitive about networking with people out of work to find work.  But a room full of out-of-work people who are seeking employment and having interviews on a regular basis is a very fertile field, it turns out, because they know people with whom they have networked and interviewed who know people who know others who know people who are hiring.  It may be counter-intuitive, but it works, and we provide that opportunity weekly on Monday morings at 8:00 a.m. at the LDS Business College for unemployed professionals who are serious about their job search.  Ours is only one of many networking meetings across the Wasatch Front from Logan to St. George on every day of the week in other centers.  There are 322 Employment Resource Centers worldwide doing the same things.  Find a meeting near you at the local Employment Resource Center, and learn for yourselves the power of networking into your next job.

3.  Support each other in your ward. 

Find out what services or products are being sold by others in your own wards.  Buy from those people you know in your wards and stakes.  If you are remodeling your home or building out your basement, look for people you can employ in your own neighborhood, rather than getting bids from strangers.  If your car needs repairs, turn to a mechanic in the ward.  Support each other, and sustain those who are either underemployed or unemployed.  It's always astounding to me how we come together each week on Sunday in a three-hour block of religious meetings, but few of us know the occupations of our ward members.  We know them only on a superficial level of Brother or Sister so-and-so.  Do you know what everyone does for a living in your ward?  Have you asked them for their help?  Or are you still suffering under the worn-out stigma that unemployment is a condition akin to adultery and unemployed people must have some kind of sickness or illness that is taboo and should to be avoided like one who has leprosy?  It was King Benjamin who offered valuable insight:  Perhaps thou shalt say: The man has brought upon himself his misery; therefore I will stay my hand, and will not give unto him of my food, nor impart unto him of my substance that he may not suffer, for his punishments are just — But I say unto you, O man, whosoever doeth this the same hath great cause to repent; and except he repenteth of that which he hath done he perisheth forever, and hath no interest in the kingdom of God. For behold, are we not all beggars? Do we not all depend upon the same Being, even God, for all the substance which we have, for both food and raiment, and for gold, and for silver, and for all the riches which we have of every kind? (Mosiah 4:17-19).

4.  Bear one another's burdens. 

A week ago in our ward, Patsy and I presented a fifth-Sunday combined priesthood and Relief Society lesson about our mission and what we are doing to assist others find work.  I asked for a show of hands at the end in response to the question, "How many of you have family members who have lost their employment in the last two years?"  Nearly every hand in the audience went up.  This week several told me they have encouraged others in their family to contact me and learn more.  That's good.  It's exactly how it happened for me last year.  I told our ward members to go to http://www.ldsjobs.org/ and pass that website along to everyone they know who is looking for work, whether a member of the Church or not.  We are in an economic debacle right now that is NOT the fault of those who have been affected by its ravages.  Companies in survival mode have been laying off people routinely.  I have met many who are in their late 50s or early 60s who are out of work for the first time in their lives.  Company layoff decisions are not always fair.  In fact, they are rarely fair, since there is no such thing as "fair" in this life.  Several senior executives I have met have years of experience, but they represented high-priced salaries on the balance sheet that had to be jetisoned so their companies could survive.  Their jobs were eliminated to cut costs, in some cases only months within full vesting in their retirement pensions, and to say it was their "fault" for losing their jobs is grossly inaccurate.  As I have said before, sometimes there are no good answers to the "Why?" questions.  Some things just happen.  Instead of judging another's circumstances harshly in today's economy, we need to seek ways to bear one another's burdens.  Often all that is needed is a kind word, a friendly smile, and an accepting heart filled with encouragement and love unfeigned. 

President Thomas S. Monson suggested the antidote for our own suffering, when he said recently: 

The Apostle Paul admonished, “By love serve one another.” (Galatians 5:13).  Recall with me the familiar words of King Benjamin in the Book of Mormon: “When ye are in the service of your fellow beings ye are only in the service of your God.”  (Mosiah 2:17).
The Savior taught His disciples, “For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: but whosoever will lose his life for my sake, the same shall save it.”  (Luke 9:24).
I believe the Savior is telling us that unless we lose ourselves in service to others, there is little purpose to our own lives. Those who live only for themselves eventually shrivel up and figuratively lose their lives, while those who lose themselves in service to others grow and flourish — and in effect save their lives.  (President Thomas S. Monson, “What Have I Done for Someone Today?,” Ensign, November 2009, 84–87).

We are living in a day, perhaps as never before, when the law of consecration is very much in evidence, at least in the circles in which I travel.  I saw a young man the other day at our networking meeting who was engaging several of the participants with names and contact information of people he knew they should be talking to.  Two of our employers, recent graduates of the program, were there as recruiters for the companies they represent now. 

The ripples in the pond of helping and sustaining one another in consecrated service are widening. 

We are still seeing new people at our meetings who have never been there before.  Each week we greet about twenty-five or thirty new participants who have heard about what we do through word of mouth principally, sometimes from bishops, ward employment specialists, or friends who have come and then told them about it.  In each case, it takes extraordinary faith and courage to show up bright and early on Monday morning dressed in a shirt and tie or Sunday bandbox best for the women.  They are conducting their job search with faith and diligence, following the prescribed path the leaders of the Church have felt inspired to set forward for our day and time.  There is one pragmatic and proven reason:  It works!

We often see people who are not of our faith who come nevertheless because they have been assured they will find what they are looking for, and without cost to them.  About half the people who found employment through applying the program to their job search were not members of our Church last year.  While the unemployment numbers are still high nationwide, we are blessed here in Utah, as I have said before.  Our unemployment numbers are lower than the national average, and there are ample opportunities for those who are willing to put in the work to find the work they are seeking.

There are many in our program who voluntarily assist the job seeker, folks who themselves are looking for work.  The authenticity of the program is in clear evidence to those who come.  These are seasoned professionals who know whereof they speak because they are in the thick of it shoulder to shoulder with those they serve.

I've always loved what President Lorenzo Snow said:  “When you find yourselves a little gloomy, look around you and find somebody that is in a worse plight than yourself; go to him and find out what the trouble is, then try to remove it with the wisdom which the Lord bestows upon you; and the first thing you know, your gloom is gone, you feel light, the Spirit of the Lord is upon you, and everything seems illuminated.” (Conference Report, Apr. 1899, 2–3).

Please take note:  These simple suggestions from prophets are in stark contrast to the TRILLIONS of dollars being squandered in Washington D.C. today.  The problem with having prophets among us is they are too simplistic, too humble, too true.

Only a conniving politician would attempt to give a convoluted and contorted explanation as the justification for the plethora of spending bills we are told are absolutely essential to our economic survival.  BIGGER AND BIGGER GOVERNMENT BORROWING TRILLIONS IS NOT THE ANSWER.

But a living prophet, like his predecessors, has the antidote.  He says, "Go find somebody to serve."

It's just way too simple.  I am a witness, however, that simple is good. . .  and it works.